billking ([info]billking) wrote,
@ 2008-10-05 13:55:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:busy
Current music:"Covers"

Gotcha covered …
I spent a pleasant morning this week listening to the latest of what seems to be a spate of covers albums.

This one, forthrightly titled “Covers,” came out this week and features James Taylor and his band doing live-in-the-studio renditions of other folks’ songs. Taylor, of course, has a successful track record with covers such as “Handy Man,” “Up on the Roof” and “How Sweet It Is.” The project originally started out as a collection of r&b covers but eventually morphed into something more general, though r&b and country are the dominant flavors in the set, with a little rock ’n’ roll thrown in.

The album works extremely well, not just because Taylor still has one of pop music’s most ingratiating voices, but because he’s taken material ranging from the Temptations to the Dixie Chicks to Leonard Cohen to Eddie Cochran and made it stylistically his own, with some tracks almost indistinguishable from JT originals.

The album opens in an r&b groove with a laid-back reading of “It’s Growing,” a Smokey Robinson tune originally done by the Temptations, followed by a soulful version of the Jr. Walker and the All-Stars tune “(I’m a) Road Runner.”

Then Taylor switches gears and tackles the great Jimmy Webb classic that was a smash for Glen Campbell, “Wichita Lineman.” Doing a song so closely associated with another artist isn’t easy, but Taylor pulls it off by giving it a folky arrangement using understated violin and piano.

Veering into country, Taylor comes up with a fiddle-backed version of George Jones’ “Why Baby Why.” That leads into a mildy funky, horn-backed rendition of the Dixie Chicks’ upbeat “Some Days You Gotta Dance,” followed by the track that for me is the album’s high point, a lovely country-folk version of John Anderson’s “Seminole Wind” backed by a mournful fiddle. Drop this into any of JT’s albums of originals and it would fit just fine. I found myself hitting repeat over and over on this track.

Next up is the Leonard Cohen poem-song “Suzanne,” a favorite from when it was done by Noel Harrison back in the ’60s. Arranged with violin and piano, JT’s slowed-down version is gorgeous.

Then comes a slightly tongue-in-cheek r&b workout on the Lieber-Stoller Elvis tune “Hound Dog,” featuring soulful backing vocalists, horns and organ. After a spoken dedication to mothers as an opening, Taylor takes a smooth dip further into soul with the Spinners tune “Sadie.” That’s followed by a very relaxed, understated horn-backed treatment of “On Broadway.”

The tempo picks up with an r&b arrangement of Eddie Cochran’s “Summertime Blues” before the album winds up with a chugging Bo Diddley-style reading of Buddy Holly’s “Not Fade Away.”

My sole complaint about the album is that it’s only about 40 minutes long and leaves you wanting more. But maybe that’s not a bad thing.

Another cover album I’ve enjoyed recently, though I probably won’t play it all that often, is the Smithereens’ “B-Sides The Beatles,” the follow-up to their “Meet the Smithereens” tribute to “Meet The Beatles!” Here, the New Jersey band focuses for the most part on the flip side of singles from the early years of The Beatles’ recording career, staying away from the more stylistically diverse later tracks. And as with their earlier Beatles tribute album, this isn’t strictly a sound-alike performance — the Smithereens do follow the original arrangements, including backing vocals, and pretty well nail the instrumental backing, but they make no attempt to “do” The Beatles vocally.

My favorites are “Thank You Girl,” “There’s a Place” and “Ask Me Why,” the latter featuring a superb job with the backing vocals. The other B-sides are fun listening too, including “I’ll Get You” (love the middle eight!), “You Can’t Do That,” “Cry for a Shadow” (the Hamburg instrumental done complete with background shouts), “P.S. I Love You” (on which session player Andy White handles drums, as he did on the Beatles original), “I’m Happy Just to Dance With You,” “If I Fell” (nice harmonies), “Slow Down” (the lead vocal isn’t as raucous as John Lennon’s) and “I Don’t Want to Spoil the Party.” The only false note to me is the inclusion of album closer “Some Other Guy,” a tune that The Beatles did live but never recorded. Hey, if you’re going to do an album of B-sides, is it too much to ask that you stick to B-sides? I’d much rather have had “I Should Have Known Better,” “She’s a Woman” or “I’m Down,” though I can understand why they shied away from “Yes It Is.” Still, an enjoyable trip to the musical past.

QUICKIES: Reading about original Kingston Trio member Nick Reynolds’ death this week at age 75 reminded me of the days of “Hootenanny” on TV and the album by the Trio that my Dad bought along with the family’s first stereo (the portable suitcase model for my Mom that later became mine). The Kingston Trio may have presented a more commercialized, mainstream version of folk music, but they kicked off the folk music craze with their smash hit of “Tom Dooley” in the late ’50s and made it possible for more challenging folk artists such as Joan Baez and even Bob Dylan to reach a mass audience. …

The trailer for the upcoming Tom Cruise WWII thriller “Valkyrie” looks pretty good, though I found Cruise’s American accent in the role of the German officer who tried to off Hitler a bit disconcerting. You can watch the trailer here:
http://movies.yahoo.com/feature/valkyrie.html?showVideo=1

I’m not so sure it’s a good idea for Russell Crowe to be playing both the Sheriff of Nottingham AND Robin Hood in the new Ridley Scott reworking of the Sherwood Forest legend, in which the sheriff is the good guy. Sounds gimmicky and ego-driven. …

If Guy Ritchie plays it straight, his more action-oriented rethinking of Sherlock Holmes, with Robert Downey Jr. as Holmes and Jude Law as Watson, could be a lot of fun. But with a comedy version featuring Sacha Baron Cohen and Will Ferrell also in the pipeline, we don’t need another campy treatment of the Great Detective. …

Thank God for Turner Classic Movies, one of the few cable/satellite channels that hasn’t veered away from its original concept. The Atlanta-based channel has put together a 24-hour marathon on Oct. 12 of films starring the late, lamented Paul Newman, one of the classiest stars and most generous humanitarians Hollywood has ever produced. Included are: “The Rack,” “Until They Sail,” “Torn Curtain,” “Exodus,” “Sweet Bird of Youth,” “Hud,” “Somebody Up There Likes Me,” “Cool Hand Luke,” “Cat on a Hot Tin Roof,” “Rachel, Rachel” and “The Outrage.” My own favorite Newman flicks: “The Long Hot Summer,” “Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid,” “The Sting,” “Slap Shot,” “Absence of Malice” and “The Verdict.” Meanwhile, one of the most heartfelt tributes to Newman came from his pal and fellow racing enthusiast, Dave Letterman, whose rambling reminiscence was both funny and fond. You can watch it here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbBMrz1DmXc

Warner Bros. and DC Comics never would allow the “Smallville” producers to let their young Clark Kent encounter the young Bruce Wayne because they didn’t want to overlap at all with the Batman movie series, but the CW now is working on a sort-of spinoff called “The Graysons,” which features the adventures of young Dick Grayson before he met the Caped Crusader and became Robin. Which is kinda weird, since the current Christian Bale Batman movie series apparently has no intention of introducing a Robin (thankfully). As one of those who always believed the highest purpose Robin could serve was as a target to draw bullets away from Batman, I would much rather see DC devote its TV emphasis on a more worthy comic book character. …

I’m not much of a Rosie O’Donnell fan and never have been (going back to her “Star Search” and VH1 days), but I’m rooting for her upcoming Thanksgiving special that’s serving as a pilot for a prospective live variety hour on NBC. That’s a genre I’d love to see return to prime-time network TV. …

A live-action version of Hanna-Barbera’s “Yogi Bear” with CGI versions of Yogi and Boo Boo interacting with real actors? Sounds like the worst idea for a feature film since the “Scooby Doo” movies. …

Probably the most distinctive soap opera theme of all time is that of “Days of Our Lives,” which surprisingly was written by Tommy Boyce and Bobby Hart, better known for their Monkees tunes and their own hit “I Wonder What She’s Doing Tonight.” Anyway, SongVest.com is offering fans a chance to own a piece of the soap theme in an auction running through Oct. 14. The winning bidder will receive a plaque declaring them co-owner of the song. …

The latter years of “My Three Sons” were pretty clunky, as Chip or Ernie Douglas would put it, but the first few years of the 1960s sitcom with the great Fred MacMurray as widower Steve Douglas and William Frawley as granddad/housekeeper Bub (plus the original three sons, including Disney vet Tim Considine), weren’t bad at all. Volume 1 of the first season finally made it out on DVD this past week. …

Tarzan hasn’t fared too well at the movies in recent decades, with the exception of 1984’s “Greystoke” with Christopher Lambert as the ape man, but Edgar Rice Burroughs fans are probably cautiously optimistic that the director who revived the “Mummy” franchise, Stephen Sommers, is negotiating with Warner Bros. to do a new Tarzan flick. I’m sure they would have preferred Guillermo del Toro, who was originally attached to the project, but he’s got a four-year commitment in New Zeland with the two “Hobbit” pictures. ...

Good news for those of us who count ourselves as fans of the delectable Diane Kruger (“Troy,” the “National Treasure” movies). The German-born actress has joined the cast of Quentin Tarantino’s Brad Pitt WWII adventure, “Inglorious Bastards.” Meanwhile, Disney does plan a third “National Treasure,” though no date is set yet.

If you'd like to add to or have your say about anything in this column, just click on comment below. You don't have to be registered with Live Journal.




(Post a new comment)

Beatles' covers
(Anonymous)
2008-10-05 08:05 pm UTC (link)
Too bad the Smithereens didn't cover 'You Know My Name, Look Up the Number'. Or was that really a B-side? I'm not sure. This shows you how good the Beatles were--how many artists even had B-sides that were worthy of a cover album? That might be an interesting subject for your blog, Bill.

Bean in Seattle--AHS, Class of '70

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Beatles' covers
[info]billking
2008-10-05 09:42 pm UTC (link)
Yes, The Beatles' B-sides often were superior to many other artists' A-sides.

And, yes, "You Know My Name" was a B-side (to "Let It Be"). Somehow, though, I can't imagine a Smithereens version of that working. Or anyone else's, for that matter.

Like I said, I can't even really see the Smithereens doing "Yes It Is." But there are other pre-"Pepper" B-sides that they could handle quite well, I'm sure.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]kotoole
2008-10-06 04:44 am UTC (link)
I just got JT's new album and love it. He has such a knack for selecting songs (ones he didn't write, of course) that are perfectly suited for him. He can sing anything from jazz to rock to R&B to country, and "Covers" really showcases that talent. I agree--the album is too short!

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]billking
2008-10-06 02:24 pm UTC (link)
I'd love to hear him do an entire album of country/folk material.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

The Smithereens
(Anonymous)
2008-10-06 12:11 pm UTC (link)
Last Friday night Pat DeNizio of the Smithereens co hosted 'Beatlesongs' with Rob Leonard on 90.3 FM here on Long Island's WHPC-FM. He sang some Beatle songs and was fun to listen to. He said a possible idea for a future Smitheeens project was putting out a CD that 'would have been' the first Beatles album after their breakup, with Fab Four's earliest solo hits and songs. I think that's a great idea. Re: Paul Newman, my favorite movie he starred in was 'The Sting', but as you pointed out Bill, there were many. And didn't Peter Frampton also cover '(I'm a) Road Runner' on his 'I'm In You; album? GW

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: The Smithereens
[info]billking
2008-10-06 02:26 pm UTC (link)
The Smithereens idea sounds similar to the show that the Fab Faux did last year.

Yeah, Frampton did cover that song.


(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]asuss49
2008-10-06 01:22 pm UTC (link)
Strange things happen when one is immersed in another time while doing book research. During one of my plunges into January, 1964, I came across an item that Paul Newman had been voted best actor of 1963 (principally for "Hud") in a survey of movie reviewers and commentators for the movie industry trade paper Film Daily. Nothing earth-shaking but it just felt weird to come across this item just a few days after Newman's passing.
By the way, on Sunday night's episode of "The Simpsons", a dedication to Paul was slipped into the end credits, with a drawing of a bottle of Newman's Own salad dressing. One of the last of the true Movie Stars-and so much more.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]billking
2008-10-06 02:28 pm UTC (link)
Newman's charity work alone puts him head and shoulders above most other stars.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2008-10-06 03:29 pm UTC (link)
Seeing the mention of "Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid" made me think of the scene where Paul Newman and Katharine Ross try to ride a bicycle while B.J. Thomas's "Raindrops Keep Fallin' on My Head" plays on the soundtrack. That, for my money, is one of the greatest movie scenes of all time.

--Brad Hundt

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]billking
2008-10-06 03:36 pm UTC (link)
Yeah, that's Newman at his most charming.


(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2008-10-06 04:41 pm UTC (link)
Another thing you have to say for Paul Newman is he aged gracefully. Not only did he continue to look great into his 70s and 80s, but he also picked his projects pretty well over the couple of decades. He didn't fall into the trap that ensnared Marlon Brando and Laurence Olivier of taking any script that fell into his in-box for the paycheck. Sadly, that seems to be the route that Al Pacino and Robert DeNiro are going, if the reviews for "Righteous Kill" and their other recent work is any indication.

--Brad Hundt

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]billking
2008-10-06 04:47 pm UTC (link)
Pacino hasn't done much worthwhile in the past 25 years, sadly, and his scenery-chewing has long been out of hand.

De Niro was still credible up until a couple of years ago, but I fear he's heading into a career decline. I liked his work as a director on "The Good Shepherd." Maybe he should take a page out of Clint Eastwood's book and concentrate on directing, only taking the occasional choice acting role.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2008-10-06 06:01 pm UTC (link)
I couldn't agree more. "Good Shepherd" was underrated, and makes you wish DeNiro would take on more directorial work, rather than appearing in crap like "Showtime" or "15 Minutes."

Pacino was pretty good as Shylock in an adaptation of "Merchant of Venice" a few years ago, and he was fine in a supporting role in "Glengarry Glen Ross" back in '92. But, yeah, he seems to have lost the cool and control he had when he played Michael Corleone in the first two "Godfathers" and now resorts to bellowing and grimacing like a 19th century actor trying to reach the upper balcony.

--Brad Hundt

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2008-10-07 12:36 am UTC (link)
He was pretty bad in the third "Godfather" film, too. But then just about everything about it was bad. Which was unfortunate since the first two are among the best films ever made.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]billking
2008-10-07 12:37 am UTC (link)
the above comment was by me

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Pacino
(Anonymous)
2008-10-07 09:46 am UTC (link)
Re: Al; Martin Short did a great impression of him on his 'Jiminy Glick' talk show a few years back. Always yelling, over the top, emoting like there's no tomorrow. Whatever happened to him anyway? (Pacino, not Short). GW

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Pacino
[info]billking
2008-10-07 01:48 pm UTC (link)
Maybe Pacino got creatively lazy. And probably didn't work with enough directors willing to rein him in.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Pacino
(Anonymous)
2008-10-12 06:19 am UTC (link)
Hey Bill, any thoughts on Ringo's weird message on his website?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Pacino
[info]billking
2008-10-13 03:14 pm UTC (link)
I dunno. Bad day?
Tired of some pushy "fans" trying to take advantage of him by getting autographs and selling them?
Family crisis that will take up his time?
Could be any number of things.
Ringo was a rarity in that up to now he would still accept stuff by mail to be autographed.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Ringo
(Anonymous)
2008-10-15 12:46 pm UTC (link)
He could have been a bit more gracious. (A lot more gracious.) He looked like an old grouch. Maybe he figured that since nobody pays any attention to his albums...or buys them...why should he do anything for anybody. He could have just quietly stopped doing autographs. To be so formal about it and come across the way he did, is a big mistake. Lots of good will still out there for the Beatles. He will be the biggest loser.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Ringo
[info]billking
2008-10-15 02:41 pm UTC (link)
Indeed, from a public relations standpoint it was a disaster.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Ringo Responds
[info]billking
2008-10-15 07:25 pm UTC (link)
I was right. It was the eBay situation.

Here's a statement released today by Ringo's publicist:

Ringo Starr Statement regarding recent video update on his website:

Ringo Starr recently put a video update on his official website asking people not to continue to send fan mail to be signed after October 20. This was in direct response to an inordinate amount of items which have recently appeared for sale on e-bay, and to those that repeatedly send cards and items to be signed.

This message was not aimed at "real fans" and after over 45 yrs of signing we know they will understand. Ringo has always signed items and is in fact the only Beatle to have been doing so.

Ringo also feels strongly that it is a waste of paper and we all should be mindful of our carbon footprint. At the end of the day Ringo wanted to make a message that was clear and to the point and is confident his real fans understand that.
That said, the recent response from the media has prompted him to clarify that video.

"How amazed am I to the reaction to my video update. I hope this statement gets as much. Please read this in a mellow way. Peace and love, Ringo."

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Ringo Responds
(Anonymous)
2008-10-16 12:22 pm UTC (link)
Thanks Ringo. All is forgiven. Now if only the explanation/clarification were covered as extensively as the original "don't bother me" statement. If I may change the subject just a bit: Paul will be putting out a new album that I hope will be a huge success for him. It sounds intriguing. I hope he goes all out for it in the publicity department. The timing, etc., for its release does, however, pose questions on new versions of Beatles' CDs. (Yes, it's a tired old subject.) There is total silence on that. Even the "Beatles Ipods" to be sold at Bloomingdale's for Christmas are said to contain no Beatles music which sounds a bit strange. What are we to make of all this? Can we ever expect new versions of the group's albums or should we just forget about it and shut the hell up and accept what we have? Anything new on this that you may know? Anything?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Ringo Responds
[info]billking
2008-10-16 01:00 pm UTC (link)
Britain's Mojo magazine has heard some of the remastered versions and reports in its October issue that all of the British albums plus MMT, the two Past Masters and Yellow Submarine Songtrack have been remastered (no Hollywood Bowl) and will be released in 2009 with both mono and stereo versions.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Beatles' Remasters
(Anonymous)
2008-10-17 12:48 pm UTC (link)
I've heard that MOJO indicates the new versions keep George Martin's original balance separation...voices on one side of the mix and the instruments on the other. If so, that is very disheartening to me. I hate that especially in "Rubber Soul." There is nothing in the middle and the whole mix is so very disjointed. I never listen to that album for that reason. What a waste. I thought the guy they hired from Sony was such an expert in this field; making the music sound as good as it possibly can. Major letdown. I guess we can assume the Ipod's Bloomies will have are the "new/old" versions then? I for one won't be in line to buy that.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Beatles' Remasters
[info]billking
2008-10-17 03:40 pm UTC (link)
They do keep the original separation, but for "Rubber Soul" and "Revolver" they will provide THREE versions: mono, stereo and the 1987 rebalanced versions Martin did.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Beatles' Remasters
(Anonymous)
2008-10-18 02:26 pm UTC (link)
Sorry, don't mean to prolong this or become a nuisance, but how will people who are not Beatles' experts/aficionados have any idea of which version to buy? I mean, if there are going to be three versions of "Rubber Soul"??? Will one have to buy all three and then decide which he/she likes best. Why not just follow the example set with "Yellow Submarine Songtrack" which had great remixed versions of each song? And while we're talking about "Rubber Soul," I hope they use the orange logo on the new CD version as was on the UK vinyl/CD release instead of the drab brown/gold used when the album and CD were released in America. I mean the CDs were to follow the UK versions but didn't on the cover for that one.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Beatles' Remasters
[info]billking
2008-10-19 08:23 pm UTC (link)
No, no, no. All three versions will be ON THE SAME album.


(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Beatles' Remasters
(Anonymous)
2008-10-22 12:25 pm UTC (link)
It will be interesting to see which versions of songs from these albums they use on the Red album...if there is going to be a Red album next year or ever. (Not to mention which versions/mixes they use of "Day Tripper/We Can Work It Out" and "Paperback Writer/Rain" on the Past Masters collections since these songs apparently aren't going to be bonus tracks on the Rubber Soul and Revolver albums where they belong. And then there's the "1" album to ponder. Questions questions. And I wonder why it always seems to be "next year" when it comes to Apple? These "next year" things become the next decade/century sort of thing with that company.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Beatles' Remasters
[info]billking
2008-10-22 09:38 pm UTC (link)
Red and Blue Albums currently are not scheduled for restoration. Just the regular U.K. albums, MMT and the two Past Masters collections.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Beatles' Remasters
(Anonymous)
2008-10-24 12:27 pm UTC (link)
The word out on the Remasters is that Paul and Ringo signed off on them ages ago, but Olivia and Yoko are delaying the entire project. They must sign off on each and every note their respective hubby sings/plays on each and every bloody song, you see. And they apparently aint in any hurry. One or the other wants the absolute last word. My money's on Yoko being THE ONE. Isn't she always? It has to be about her. The Beatles, their music and their fans are secondary. She'll decide when it suits her. She was in charge 40 years ago during the White Album sessions and she's still in control. The release of any remasters could be....never. Am I a little bit angry? Bloody right. And with the economy as it is, who will buy Beatle product when they have to worry about buying bread anyway? The delays will go on and on and....

(Reply to this) (Parent)

A note from my daughter ...
[info]billking
2008-10-17 08:36 pm UTC (link)
http://ojpking.livejournal.com/

Read my last post and watch the video!

(Reply to this)


[info]Patrick Roberts [kogmedia.com]
2008-10-20 06:22 am UTC (link)
Russell Crowe's accent seems to already resemble something that would fit in a new Robin Hood movie... though he'll probably have to get a bit slimmer than what his recent role in Body of Lies

(Reply to this)


Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…