billking ([info]billking) wrote,
@ 2009-07-19 22:21:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Current mood: nostalgic
Current music:Oldies from the summer of 1969

Yes, that’s the way it was
It was a Sunday afternoon quite unlike any other I’ve ever known. From lunchtime on until the early hours of the morning, we sat in our downstairs family room, transfixed by what we were watching on our TV set.

For some strange reason, as I look back 40 years at July 20, 1969, one of my clearest memories is of the way CBS News came out of one of the rare commercial breaks taken during that day’s wall-to-wall coverage of the Apollo 11 mission. “This afternoon,” the announcer’s voice intoned, “a landing on the moon! Brought to you by the International Paper Co.”

Talk about the ultimate product placement.

A few weeks later, while on a late-summer vacation at the lake, I wrote a column for the first-day-of-school issue of my high school newspaper noting the bizarre way past and present had merged during that eventful summer of 1969. We had watched an ancient royal ritual, the investiture of Britain’s Prince Charles as the Prince of Wales, as it happened earlier that same month, thanks to satellites in outer space. If you don’t remember what that was like, here’s a clip from YouTube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cS8OXdtSoCs

Likewise, an estimated 528 million viewers around the world tuned in as astronauts Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin guided their landing craft to the surface of a prehistoric orb in the sky. According to the ratings services, 93 percent of U.S. televisions were tuned in to the moon landing that afternoon (God only knows what the other seven percent were watching). And like 45 percent of American TV sets, ours was tuned to CBS, where veteran newsman Walter Cronkite, a longtime space program enthusiast, and Wally Schirra, one of the original Mercury Seven astronauts, were anchoring the coverage. (NBC had 34 percent of the viewing audience that day while ABC had 14 percent. That was it back then; just the three networks. No cable news channels.)

Of course, what we were watching was primitive by today’s standards. There was no live telecast from the lunar module carrying the two astronauts to the surface. So we saw a CBS animated simulation of what was happening while we listened to the live audio of the exchanges between Armstrong and Aldrin and the NASA communicator in Houston.

But that was still plenty exciting. You could hear the tension in Cronkite and Schirra’s voices as they commented between the terse, dispassionate exchanges between the astronauts and NASA. The last couple of minutes, Walter and Wally didn’t say anything, just listening with the rest of us as Aldrin guided the craft over the moon’s surface, looking for a suitable landing spot. I shudder to think what it would have been like had something gone wrong, with us hanging on every word. The simulation didn’t account for all the hovering time, so it ran ahead of real time, showing the craft down prematurely.

Finally, at 4:18 p.m. Eastern Time, we heard Aldrin say, “Contact light …” and Schirra exhaled, “We’re home.” Exulted Cronkite: “Man on the moon!” Then came Armstrong, sounding completely calm: “Houston, Tranquility Base here. The Eagle has landed.”

The camera cut to Cronkite, as he took off his glasses and rubbed his hands together. “Oh, boy!” Schirra was wiping a tear from one of his eyes.

“Wally, say something,” Cronkite grinned, “I’m speechless.”

Later that evening, when CBS’ Roger Mudd asked Spiro Agnew what he thought of the moment, the usually loquacious vice president was uncharacteristically forthright: “If Cronkite doesn’t know what to say, don’t expect me to come up with anything too good.”

Thanks to YouTube, we can relive those tense moments and Cronkite and Schirra’s elation:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g_sWmD6NvMY

The biggest thrill was still to come, with first Armstrong and then Aldrin scheduled to climb out of the lunar lander and set foot on the moon’s surface that evening. Here, we actually got to see what was happening, sort of, as a live TV camera deployed from the side of the landing craft showed the shadowy, ghostly image of Armstrong moving slowly down the ladder. It was difficult to tell what you were seeing; Cronkite thought Armstrong was actually on the lunar surface when he was still on the final step. Then, at 10:56 p.m., came the crackling first words from the moon’s surface, which Armstrong flubbed slightly by leaving out an article: “That’s one small step for [a] man, one giant leap for mankind.”

It was tough to catch — I remember us saying to one another, “What did he say?” — and Cronkite and Schirra couldn’t quite make it out either, and had to get someone else to provide a transcription.

Watching the CBS footage now, it’s amusing to see Armstrong ignoring the proper order in which he was supposed to do things on the surface, breaking out his camera and taking pictures like a starstruck tourist while Houston gently kept nagging him to get the “contingency sample” of lunar soil that was supposed to be the first order of business in case the trip outside the lander had to be cut short. Then, for two and a quarter hours, we watched Armstrong and Aldrin bounce in and out of the camera’s view and finally set up an American flag and read the plaque on the base of the lander, which would remain on the moon, noting that “we came in peace for all mankind.” They also took a call from the Oval Office and I remember regretting that Tricky Dick had to be a part of this great occasion.

Again, the CBS footage is on YouTube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2XGFSPIhiM&NR=1

Despite the late hour, 125 million Americans stayed up to watch the moon walk, almost twice the number the networks had projected. Finally, at 1:11 a.m., with the astronauts and their moon rocks safely inside, the hatch to the lander was closed. The next day, they blasted off from the moon to rejoin Michael Collins, who was orbiting above in the Columbia spacecraft. Remarkably, that was something we actually got to see live, thanks to that camera left behind on the surface. The following Thursday, July 24, my brother Jonathan’s 12th birthday, the Columbia splashed down and the most momentous voyage in mankind’s history came to an end.

This past Friday evening, in preparation for writing this, I decided to search online for the moon landing footage and was delighted to find the CBS coverage. That was how I watched it then, and that’s how I wanted to relive it now. It was almost as thrilling this time around as it was 40 years ago. Later Friday night, when I got back on the computer to check e-mail, I discovered that at 7:42 p.m., just minutes after I had finished rewatching one of his most memorable broadcasts, 92-year-old Walter Cronkite had breathed his last.

Talk about past and present colliding!

There’ve been numerous tributes to Cronkite this weekend from all the many TV news outlets that now vie for our attention. We’ve been reminded of how he became the most trusted man in America. We’ve seen the clip of him swallowing hard to try and keep his composure after announcing the death of President Kennedy. We’ve been told again how Cronkite’s clearly labeled 1968 commentary after a trip to Vietnam, concluding that the U.S. had reached a stalemate in the war there, prompted LBJ to say, "If I've lost Cronkite, I've lost middle America."

But most importantly we’ve been reminded that the way Cronkite became the man that various polls named the most trusted in America was by reporting the news without spin or slant or gimmicks. When he signed off each weekday evening, saying, “That’s the way it is,” you didn’t have to worry about checking out other sources to see competing and/or clashing versions of the way it was.

It’s to the credit of the current crop of network news anchors that they recognize the greatness of Cronkite and that they know they can’t come close to being half the journalist he was. Or to having the sort of relationship with viewers that he had or the impact he had.

This is not a great time for journalism. Newspapers, where Cronkite’s generation of broadcasters got their start, are barely hanging on. Network television news is a pale imitation of the days of Cronkite and Edward R. Murrow, with more fluff than substance. The audience is splintered between the three traditional networks, who are increasingly less relevant to young viewers, and the cable networks, where the vogue is for shouting pundits rather than solid reporting, and the ratings leader is a thinly veiled propaganda arm of the Republican party. And more and more people get their news on the Internet, where anything goes and little is vetted in the race to get there first and attract the most page views.

It’s unfortunate, especially for my children’s generation, but the news business today is a landscape as foreign to the likes of Walter Cronkite as that desolate moonscape was 40 years ago to Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin.

If you'd like to add to or have your say about anything in this column, just click on comment below. You don't have to be registered with Live Journal.




(17 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Walter Cronkite
(Anonymous)
2009-07-20 12:07 pm UTC (link)
Bill, thanks for a great article. Brought back a lot of memories. I remember watching the moon landing. Up to that time it was the most exciting, happy news event I had ever seen live (outside of the Beatles on Ed Sullivan). To think there are those who still believe the whole thing was staged in a movie studio! Is there any major event since WWII that isn't subject to conspiracy theories? Regarding Cronkite, my memories of him include the JFK death announcement, the Vietnam coverage, the space flights, the Presidential campaigns and election night coverages, his LBJ interview and announcement on his news broadcast of the former President's death, his role in getting Sadat and Begin together,and his appearance on the Mary Tyler Moore show. Compared to the talking heads today(and his successor Dan Rather (of "What's the Frequency Kenneth" fame) he was a giant. GW

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Walter Cronkite
(Anonymous)
2009-07-20 02:03 pm UTC (link)
The moon landing is one of my earliest childhood memories. I was 3, and my parents yanked me and my sister out of bed so we could watch it. We didn't understand the magnitude of it, but they wanted us to see it. I'm sure we had Walter Cronkite on, since we were a CBS News-watching household.

--Brad Hundt

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Walter Cronkite
[info]billking
2009-07-20 07:08 pm UTC (link)
I hauled my year-old son out in the middle of the night so he could see Halley's Comet. Because I figured he stands a decent chance of getting to see it a second time in his lifetime.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: Walter Cronkite
[info]billking
2009-07-20 07:06 pm UTC (link)
Just as we'll likely never see a pop group that has the sort of impact The Beatles had, we'll never see an anchor like Cronkite again. Everything is niche these days.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]asuss49
2009-07-20 01:02 pm UTC (link)
The actual landing of the LEM turned out to be a closer call than people knew at the time. The landing spot originally selected was found to be strewn with boulders so, with Armstrong manually piloting the LEM, he and Aldrin had to look for a different "parking space", with the fuel supply for the landing rapidly running out. But, on the communication with Houston, they were still cool as cucumbers. The moon landing, Woodstock, "Abbey Road", and the '69 Mets-a summer and early fall full of miracles and near-miracles that overshadowed other tragic and grisly events of that summer.

At the time, Cronkite and Schirra came under some criticism because it was felt that they talked too much as the landing was taking place and as Armstrong was going down the ladder toward the lunar surface. In reality, as you watch those YouTube clips Bill posted above, they were just reflecting what we were all feeling at that moment.

But that was one of the things that made Cronkite so great. Even while being a consummate communicator of the facts of what was happening, he wasn't an automaton or, in this era, some blow-dried Ken or Barbie mindlessly reading lines off a teleprompter. Uncle Walter allowed his humanity to show. It had happened on Nov. 22, 1963 and as he watched the unfolding chaos at the '68 Democratic Convention in Chicago and as he called out "Go baby!" as John Glenn's Mercury spacecraft lifted off from Cape Canaveral. Matter of fact, Glenn appeared on "Face The nation" Sunday morning to talk about Cronkite and said he felt that he was pinch-hitting for Wally Schirra.

It's funny, "The Huntley-Brinkley Report" consistently beat Cronkite in the ratings through the 60's and Dan Rather anchored the "CBS Evening News" several years longer than Cronkite. And yet it was Walter Cronkite who will always be considered the towering figure of TV news in its golden era.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Complete Agreement With Al...
(Anonymous)
2009-07-20 01:34 pm UTC (link)
Walter was Walter....so poised, so effortless, so prepared....I think colleges should offer classes on his technique and style to inspire future generations of broadcasters...and I forgive him for talking so much prior to/during the moon landing...He was just like a little kid and his emotion is what endeared him to us...but even in those moments like when he collected himself after announcing Kennedy's death to the nation, he always kept it together. Consummate professional.

Another funny note: I remember Tom Hanks talking about Walter's coverage of the moon landing while doing press for Apollo 13....Tom's a big space nut and while watching at home, he was going "Shut up (Walter); he's gonna say something important!" :-)

-Jeffrey
www.thedvdmarquee.com

PS-Bill, hit me back if you're still up for talking Beatles/Rock Band/Reissues at my g-mail addy...Bringing my traveling studio into town the weekend of 8/15/09; just contacted Glover as well..

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Walter Cronkite
(Anonymous)
2009-07-20 02:26 pm UTC (link)
You may already know this, but it's possible to watch on YouTube a series of videos covering the entire breaking CBS coverage of the JFK assassination - from the moment regular programming was interrupted, until Cronkite passed over to a colleague. It's absolutely fascinating and an amazing trip back in time.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Walter Cronkite
(Anonymous)
2009-07-20 02:27 pm UTC (link)
Sorry, forgot to sign off my contribution!
Randi in the U.K.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: Walter Cronkite
[info]billking
2009-07-20 07:17 pm UTC (link)
One of the cable networks, I think maybe A&E, replayed one of the network's JFK assassination coverage a few years back on one of the anniversaries, and it was indeed fascinating. Especially how primitive graphics were (they simply held up a wire photo and the camera zoomed in on it.)

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: Complete Agreement With Al...
[info]billking
2009-07-20 07:16 pm UTC (link)
We used to sample the other networks, too, during space coverage. ABC's science editor, Jules Bergman, was particularly good at explaining how things worked. And if it was morning, we'd often be watching "Today" anyway. But when it came to the nitty gritty of the missions, particularly in the Apollo era, Cronkite and CBS were our only choice.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]billking
2009-07-20 07:13 pm UTC (link)
Huntley-Brinkley was a pop culture phenomenon ("Goodnight David, Goodnight Chet" was one of the biggest catch phrases of the era), but Cronkite surged ahead after the 1967 AFTRA strike, and some observers think it's because the space program was gaining momentum and everyone knew Uncle Walter was a space buff.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]kotoole
2009-07-20 10:16 pm UTC (link)
Great article, Bill, as it paints a vivid picture of not only the event itself (and your reaction to it), but the news coverage as well. I was thinking about how CNN, MSNBC, etc. would cover the event today--probably nonstop chatter, endless talking heads and so-called "experts" analzying everything, and over-the-top graphics. Maybe they'd take a cue from the last election and have a correspondent appear as a hologram--remember that? Times sure have changed.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

If ...
[info]billking
2009-07-20 11:36 pm UTC (link)
Fox News would find a way to blame any problems on Hillary!

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Oldies From The Summer of 1969 You Are Listening To...
(Anonymous)
2009-07-25 01:07 pm UTC (link)
Would songs from "Back To The Egg" be included? Thanks for including the great 30-year look back at this "overlooked" album. I hadn't really thought about it in quite some time or listened to it in a couple of decades until I received the latest edition of Beatlefan. It's much better than I remember! Strange how what I found negative about the album is what has stuck in my head all these years rather than what was positive. Hated the album title. I got the point Paul was making, but the word "egg" in the title of an album just wouldn't do at all. I was put off that he left off "Daytime Nighttime Suffering/Goodnight Tonight" from the album (????), and I thought his vocal was a bit shaky on the "Siam" song...couldn't understand why he recorded it in a castle! Lost in all of that was how good I thought the band was...very tight. The production was crisp and the album had great energy! Loved "Getting Closer"...he should include it on his current set list in place of "Flaming Pie"...his current band, tight as it is, could nail it studio perfect. Loved "Arrow Through Me," "Spin It On" and "Winter Rose/Love Awake." And others. Great diversity. How could I have forgotten all that? Thanks for bringing it up.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Oldies From The Summer of 1969 You Are Listening To...
(Anonymous)
2009-07-25 01:18 pm UTC (link)
Duh! I just realized Egg was from '79! Sorry.....

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: Oldies From The Summer of 1969 You Are Listening To...
[info]billking
2009-07-29 02:41 pm UTC (link)
It is indeed a better album than many people remember.

As for the songs of '69, I'll be writing more about that. Most of the songs of '79 are better left forgotten.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Back To The Egg..
(Anonymous)
2009-07-30 04:39 pm UTC (link)
Another thing to like about it is that is it one continuous/seamless piece of music. When one song ends the next one begins..no two or three seconds of silence...and I don't just mean the medleys. Was listening to some of the Capitol reissues of Beatles' American albums and there tends to be three or four or five seconds of silence between cuts. It absolutely ruins the flow of the songs and the albums. Maybe they were trying to compensate for only having 11 songs so they had to stretch it out so the album would sort of last almost a half hour. Some official Beatles albums are that way as well...the early ones in particular. I tend to make copies and remove the silence between songs. It makes the listening so much better.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(17 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…